---Scottie Bowman <rbowman@indigo.ie> wrote: > > > Trying my best, Rick, not to let your criminal neglect > of capitals put me back on the bottle I have to admit > I was much engaged by your thoughts about the Hemingway > connection. > > It's my impression that, on the whole, old Ernie is not > a greatly popular writer with Bananafish members. > Am I right in this &, if so, how come? It's very hard > for someone of my advanced senility to imagine > a generation growing up who never felt the dizzying, > liberating, wind-from-the-sea experience that that > first encounter with a page of Hemingway brought > to so many of us. > > I recall only vaguely reading Salinger's initial letter > of self-introduction to the older writer but I remember > it as expressing all the adulation that would have gone > into any letter from myself at that age. Is my memory > playing tricks? > > They wound up writing rather different kinds of story > but I'm not so sure they might not have found quite a bit > in common - if only the miseries that all writers come > to share. Hemingway certainly seems to have been > a compulsive reader & expressed his admiration for many > writers who, at first glance, would hardly have shared > his expressed view of the world. If he could express > profound respect for a dinky little Frog like Marcel Proust > wheezing away in his cork-lined cocoon recreating > the Paris haute monde he would have had little difficulty > relating to Sergeant Salinger as he put himself together > again after Normandy. > > Scottie B. > I have always been a big fan of Hemingway and I can understand why Salinger and Hemingway would connect. They both have a kind of dry literary style that I like. -Liz Friedman > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com