Re: Reasoning


Subject: Re: Reasoning
Excordis@aol.com
Date: Fri Jan 07 2000 - 23:46:26 EST


In a message dated 7/1/00 4:17:15 PM Pacific Standard Time,
AntiUtopia@aol.com writes:

> Well, yeah, I agree, Ed. The ability to "reason" is innate. Part of our
> discussion here is defining our terms. There's "reasoning" as a thing
that
> we thinking animals are born able to do. Then there's the "doing" of it

-- 
>  and the "doing" of it is socially constructed.  And then, beyond that, is 
> the 
>  discipline of formal logic.  That is also socially constructed, but the 
>  people who originally did the "constructing" (Aristotle actually invented 
> the 
>  discipline) felt that they were making a "discovery" more than "building 
>  something" (creating an artifice, something artificial).
>  
>  But either way we have to account for what it is and where it comes from.  
>  And why we think it's so darn good :)
>  
>  Jim
>  
    We use reason to construct all of these arguments, but I don't see how 
reason is logical, and so we can't prove anything.

Tory



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Feb 28 2000 - 08:38:07 EST