Patti Larrabee wrote: > I would agree with E. Roosevelt and Margaret Sanger in the top ten. These lists are difficult, > as we know. Is there really a difference between #64 and # 72? Anyway, I am glad to see > Sanger, she really did CHANGE things. Well ... it's hard to say. The introduction to the book talks about how the woman surveyed a lot of universities and stuff to come to a conclusive list - but also that quite a few people thought she was crazy to do so, which I sort of agree with. Eleanor Roosevelt may have been very influential in America, but frankly I doubt she did a bean for, for example, Australia. It'd be very difficult to put together such a list without a bias towards your own country and experiences of influential women. Again citing a (near) local example - she puts Susan B. Anthony and numerous other suffragettes in the list. Yet New Zealand was the first country in the world to give women the vote, and the campaigners responsible for this are certainly not mentioned in this book. Like I said - not a task I think I'd be willing to take on! But then again, the woman who compiled it said she hoped it would provoke debate - how could anything like this do otherwise (: ? Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest