>>Roddy Doyle, anyone? > >hmmmm? Roddy D is good stuff! The trilogy of novels is now in a boxed set over here -- oops, over in the US -- and sells pretty well. He did a few readings when Paddy Clarke came out, and I saw a few of them; he's a great reader. (And cute as a stuffed animal. I went with a few women friends of mine, who all swooned and wanted to take him home as if he were a pet.) I just bought The Woman Who Walked Into Doors before I left, but haven't had a chance to open it yet.... A few weeks back I went to see the movie they made of The Van, but fell asleep. Not a remark on the movie, but another manifestation of the rare disorder I have, cinematonarcolepsy irregularensis. I've seen all the other movies they've made of his books -- he translates uncommonly well to the screen -- and have enjoyed the others. Now, there's an interesting topic: what fiction does or does not translate well to the screen. ObSalinger on this topic: In the best of all worlds, who would make a good Holden Caulfield in a high-quality movie adaptation? I've always thought that Tom Hulce, exactly as he appeared in "Animal House," had the absolutely perfect Holden Caulfield face and manner. I'm not suggesting that the book would survive the transition to the screen (though I've often wondered how many people out there have, at some point in their lives, sat down and written what they thought of as a faithful "Catcher" screenplay). NB (since this is a fantasy idea): James Dean doesn't count; too obvious, I think.... --tim o'connor