is to modern Biblical scholarship what Chariot of the Gods was to astronomical and archaeological research in the 70s. (Ok, I know NO ONE wants to talk about this, but I did give a clear subject line, no?) Thor, Thor. . .never trust a journalist's "research" in any serious discipline. Too much of an eye for sensationalism. The real facts tend to be much more mundane. I admit, I didn't read the whole thing. I read the introduction and his chapter on "where the gospels came from." It was enough for the time being. Thor, if you've read the book I recommended, let me know and I'll still go out and read this one front to back. But if not...tell ya what. If you really want to read about the Templars and all that crap, I recommend Umberto Eco's Foucault's Pendulum as the most responsible take possible on that kind of research (and it's a novel! :) ). If you want real Biblical scholarship, I recommend Word Biblical Commentary's volumes -- any of them. They tend to be moderate theologically, take into account numerous points of view, describe different positions regarding dating and authorship of various Biblical books, and AFTER doing so make an argument for their own position. It's not that the authors of HBHG assume some of the premises of liberal scholarship uncritically, offering them up as fact. I respect liberal Biblical scholarship. But I don't think any scholar would take this particular book very seriously. Jim Rovira Check out "Up Against the Wall" for links to numerous literature and writing resources on the internet. http://members.aol.com/antiutopia/main.htm ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.