Re: hemingway

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: XCRUSHx@aol.com: "Re: (no subject)"
• Previous message: TravROIS@aol.com: "(no subject)"
• Maybe in reply to: Patti Larrabee: "hemingway"
• Next in thread: Hotbuns200@aol.com: "Re: hemingway"

At 01:19 AM 6/6/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Being phony to oneself is one of the worst things I can think of.
>
>Being forced to be phony to society isn't bad, as long as you aren't using
>faulty logic to justify it.
>
>Speaking of gay people, is anyone here highly knowledgeable regarding the
>bible?  A (gay) friend said that King James was gay; and that the KJ
>translation of the bible is the only one that says it is wrong.  Any truth
>to this?
>
Well, I had this problem of actually reading my European History text.
Indeed, it did insinuate that King James was gay.  Of course, the text
pretty much insinuated that everyone under the moon was homosexual.
However, if you would like the bibliography of the text so you can see for
yourself, I'd be happy to give it to you.

--Misty



 If it were
 then would it be.
 If it weren't
 would you die

 So if you are
 then how far
 would you go
 To die?
--Jacques Hemingway

• Next message: XCRUSHx@aol.com: "Re: (no subject)"
• Previous message: TravROIS@aol.com: "(no subject)"
• Maybe in reply to: Patti Larrabee: "hemingway"
• Next in thread: Hotbuns200@aol.com: "Re: hemingway"