You'd be surprised who `comes out' of the history books. (I once heard a joke: `If MichaelAngelo had been straight he would have done the Sistine Chapel in matt white' (: Although that wonderful bastion of society, Charlton Heston, assures us that researching `The Agony And The Ecstacy' he worked out that there was no way Michael Angelo was gay, no way, uh uh not Heston playing a pansy licking queenie boy, no siree. As Barbara Stanwyck once said: `Heston has a bad memory. He still thinks he's parting the Red Sea' . Anyway, back to relevance ...) I was in a Renaissance Poetry class at university, and we were studying Shakespeare's sonnets, and discussing the one about `Thou master-mistress of my passion'. I'm of two minds about the `gay Shakespeare' theory - in those days it was quite acceptable to have a passionate non sexual male to male friendship - yet our tutor ended up getting a death threat (no kidding) for daring to even suggest it !!! Geez louise, live and let live is what I say! Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST http://www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest Aaron wrote: > > I don't know about King James being gay, but I do know that at least the > > Standard Revised edition (Lev 18:22) condemns homosexuality. I imagine all > > translations include this passage, although some probably word it more > > obliquely than others. > > --bethany > > Lev 18:22 is where it specifically condems it? No homophobe I've ever met > has been able to tell me. I'll have to go to the library and get one of > those multiple translation books that you're not allowed to check out ;)