Yeah, that's the thing...the only way I can see escaping the limitations of any one narrator's perspective is by writing the narrative in the third person from an omniscient point of view. I think "unreliable narrator" is best reserved for those narrators who seek to deliberately deceive the reader. Jim On Mon, 14 Jun 1999 08:39:33 +0100 Scottie Bowman <rbowman@indigo.ie> writes: > It appears that the term 'unreliable narrator' is one > that all self-respecting American literateurs use with > comfortable familiarity. It keeps returning to this > list like a familiar exam topic that all candidates > would be wise to master. It's not so familiar to me. > > I'd have thought that all first person narratives are, > by their nature, idiosyncratic, subjective & thereby > 'unreliable'. We've had everything from Huck to > Nick Carroway to the Larry of Razor's Edge cited > as examples. > > I'd be more interested to hear examples of what > the experts regard as a 'reliable' narrator. > > Scottie B. > ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.