If any of my colleagues discovered this post, I'd be burned at the stake. -----Original Message----- From: Aaron [mailto:aaron.brager@writeme.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 5:56 PM To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu Subject: Re: Salinger turns to the Dark Side Amen. No offense; but I wouldn't expect to hear that from a microsoft guy =]> -- Cheers, Aaron Today's Quote: "When you mark a web site as a Favorite[, there are two issues.] The first issue could allow code to be run on your computer. The second issue could allow the local hard drive to be read." --Microsoft Web Site ----- Original Message ----- From: Sean Draine (Exchange) <seandr@Exchange.Microsoft.com> To: <bananafish@lists.nyu.edu> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 1999 9:04 PM Subject: RE: Salinger turns to the Dark Side > > Camille: > "I was thinking the other day about the idea of geniuses working in vacuums, > and thinking what a terribly dangerous way it is to work..." > > I quite agree, Camille! > > Theoretical physicists may thrive in a vacuum, but fiction writers do not. > If you're going to write about people for people, it really helps to have a > few of them around. If a writer has spent a decade holed up alone in a > cabin, it should come as no surprise that he publishes a socially impaired > book about a writer who has spent a decade holed up alone in a cabin, and > calls it "Seymour: an Introduction". > > The Phantom Menace is another superb example. Before seeing it (sorry, it's > a job requirement where I work), I saw a 20/20 special on the making of the > movie that indicated that Lucas exercised absolute "artistic" control over > the film. The result was the worst movie ever made. The characters, the > dialog, the story couldn't have been any less engaging. Without the special > effects, the film would have been more boring than a 16 hour documentary of > someone reading Catcher. I'm with Anthony Lane - this movie is crap. > > -Sean > > > > > > >