I disagree, Jake. He's been writing all these years for pleasure, his pleasure, not yours. If he cared if we were happy he would still be publishing. Florie >From: Jake McHenry <seymour@ktis.net> >Reply-To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu >To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu >Subject: Re: Sunday Times article >Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:53:05 -0600 > >I am wondering why in the world would our man Salinger hole himself up for >years writing and then opt to burn all of his work. Where did the whole talk >of the manuscript burning come from anyway? I am thinking that if he were to >plan on destroying his work then why would he even attempt publishing >Hapworth again. In my mind there are piles of pages of stories just waiting >for us to see. Ober and his team of rabid lawyers will see to it that >Salinger's wishes will be met regarding publication of his new work. ("Now I >mean nothing, but NOTHING, on the covers of my books. You hear me Ober?! >Just plain old white!") Even in death Salinger will get his way. (As he >damned well should, I think.) Truth be told, I just don't know if I can be >let down about it. I am nearly to a point where I almost NEED to hear about >Les and Bessie as youngsters and how they met and countless other small >things that are somehow important to me. >I just cannot buy for one single solitary second that he would burn his >work. >-Jake. >seymour@ktis.net >-----Original Message----- >From: Florie Sommers <writeflorie@hotmail.com> >To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu <bananafish@lists.nyu.edu> >Date: Tuesday, March 23, 1999 9:51 AM >Subject: Re: Sunday Times article > > >>Dickinson also wanted her work burned when she died. Actually none of >>her stuff was published during her life time, it all came after she was >>gone thats why none of her poems are named. I worry though that Salinger >>is just smart enough to burn it before he dies. I want nothing more than >>to see all his hidden work published for everyone to love but I don't >>think it will ever happen. Firstly, because of my above stated reason >>and secondly because the people around him protect him to such a degree >>that I can see them betraying him even after his death. >> >>I also worry that his recluse writing will be disappointing. Because we >>have such a wonderful little group of work we figure that all his work >>is wonderful. I'm sure that there is stuff there that he wouldn't have >>published even during his publishing years. I worry that if it is all >>released we will be flooded with work that is not his choosing and not >>his best work. >> >>In a blue sky world I would love for him to choose the work that he sees >>fit for publication after his death and lock away the remainder. No >>matter how much we love him there is no way that all the writing he has >>done since he took off is as good as the work we already have. >> >>What do you all think? >> >>Florie >> >> >>>From: Camille Scaysbrook <verona_beach@geocities.com> >>>Reply-To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu >>>To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu >>>Subject: Re: Sunday Times article >>>Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 16:20:01 +1100 >>> >>>bob pigeon wrote: >>>> if he destroyed them that would be so ridiculous >>>> kafka's dying wish was that they'd burn all his books something like >>that >>>> and instead his friend published them >>>> hahaha >>> >>>This has happened to a lot of writers. My thought on the matter is - if >>>they didn't burn them themselves then possibly they didn't *really* >>want >>>them burnt at all. This is certainly the case with Katherine Mansfield, >>who >>>requested that her remaining writings go this way - then her husband >>spent >>>the next 30 years or so getting rich off them. >>> >>>Still ... we have the stories and that's the main thing. >>> >>>Camille >>>verona_beach@geocities.com >>>@ THE ARTS HOLE http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 >>>@ THE INVERTED FOREST http://www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest >>> >> >>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com