Someone told me in this class I'm taking that the writer must be honest and I guess that's what I admire about Salinger and Ginsberg. If the writer is a searcher, than the two men have much in common with their work. I mean the two didn't just write, they lived literature. Will once told me the same thing. He told me he has not only written but lived literature. They didn't just write for commercial reasons or ego reasons but they wrote because it made them reach a place deeper and more real than the outside world. And I'm not just saying writing will tell you about yourself, I mean Ginsberg's poetic vision was more than the act of writing but searching for value beyond the physical world which can be cruel capitalistic and scarring. I mean people are always ruining things, New York can be a sad and lonely place. Everyone of Slinger's characters are scarred by the physical world. Either by their youth or by a war experience but by searching for poetry or the unspoken or the vision of poetry you can get above that and see what's real and what is beautiful like youth and even the holy everyday things that seem as disgusting. Like Seymour searching through libraries. God searching is what the writer does and that can be more beautiful than the writing itself. Personally I have found out more about myself writing pretty dumb short stories than I ever have about grammar or turning the line. I think that is what binds Salinger and Ginsberg to me in my thoughts. More ramblings from Colorado. Suerte