If you are concerned about "showing up" your teacher in front of the class, why don't you approach him before or after class and ask him to explain what he means in more detail? Or leave him a polite, well written note -- signed or anonymous. Or send him some e-mail. I think it would be a real shame if you missed out on this chance to exchange ideas on the subject. From the way it sounds, it would probably do him as much good as it would you -- not to mention all the students that will come after you. So please try to question him further in some way. He might even surprise you and be happy to open a dialogue with his students. So many high school students just take up space in the classroom and show no interest in ideas. If you ask him respectfully I don't see how he could blow you off. As for CATCHER IN THE RYE, I don't think it has nearly as much to say about Eastern philosophy as the later work. One theory I've put forward on this listserv before is that CATCHER may dramatize the frustration Salinger experienced in trying to find a spiritual base in Western culture -- in other words, CATCHER reflects the void that Vedantic Hinduism and Zen Buddhism eventually filled, for its author. The novel does concern itself, however, with certain obsessions that carry throughout Salinger's oeuvre -- childhood innocence, for example -- and which eventually dovetail with the religious themes, but nothing is spelled out very clearly, in my opinion. Rather, Salinger begins wearing his Eastern influences very much on his sleeve with "Teddy," a story that reads more like an introduction to Eastern thought than a story, and which must have been written in the same general time period as CATCHER's final drafts. For whomever was asking about the Old Testament in Salinger, "Teddy" would be a good place to look: what Salinger does is basically retell the story of Original Sin from a Vedantic perspective -- e.g. all that stuff about coughing up the apple of knowledge, and how children shouldn't be made to focus on learning the differences between things. This rereading of Genesis reminds me very much, come to think of it, of Joseph Campbell's work in interpreting the great myths of different cultures. I wonder if Campbell and Salinger ever had any contact with or influence on each other, both living in post-war New York. Does anyone know, or know how to find out? Parting shot: I'm very glad that Zen doesn't make a conspicuous appearance in CATCHER, actually. I think it could have ruined the novel -- especially if it had been presented so overtly as in "Teddy." But great novelists make great artistic decisions, and Salinger must have known how unsatisfying and dishonest it would have been to offer Zen as a quick fix for Holden's spiritual malaise. Jon PS: Speaking of the Old Testament, I just got a flash vision of Holden as a would-be Moses-figure. He's been to the mountaintop (i.e. realized that he's losing his childhood innocence), and now the best thing he think to do is come back and prevent other children from running off that same cliff (i.e. losing innocence too early or by dangerous means). I dunno -- just a thought.