Re: Hapworthless

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Tim O'Connor: "Re: how to get published - fact"
• Previous message: Ed Fenning: "Re: Hapworthless"

In a message dated 10/4/99 6:03:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
my_colours@hotmail.com writes:

<< 
 Jim,
 because of your endorsement of my opinion, I'm thinking of changing it just 
 to get a good fight going.  Seriously, though, can someone PLEASE explain to 
 me the sublime beauty of this piece.  I'm willing to try to appreciate it 
 even if I don't like it.  Just tell me why it's worth reading.
 Thor
  >>

While you were absent Camille and I talked about this a bit and she helped me 
-- well, almost ;)  If he wasn't 7. . .

Jim

• Next message: Tim O'Connor: "Re: how to get published - fact"
• Previous message: Ed Fenning: "Re: Hapworthless"