I've been thinking about Bruce's longish post two or three days ago (which is an eternity on a listserve) about Seymour's suicide. I can see how Salinger may have painted himself into a corner by **starting out** the Glass saga with Seymour's death (or, rather, starting Seymour's story with his own death). But I don't think we need to view it that way. When I think of Salinger's characters, their personalities, the problems they have, and the solutions they seek, I see Seymour's suicide as just one more example of a subject Salinger returns to again and again. Holden -- intelligent young kid, perceptive and sensitive but disillusioned, wants to run away and live in a cabin. Franny -- intelligent young girl, perceptive and sensitive but disillusioned, effectively runs away from society to the confines of her own home. So when I see Seymour, a perceptive, intelligent, sensitive somewhat young man kill himself (the ultimate escape), I see him following a pattern set by many characters in many of Salinger's stories. Everyone is a nun. I wouldn't define Seymour's suicide, then, as Salinger painting himself in to a corner, but as another example of a theme Salinger seemed to return to again and again. And I think Buddy was a vehicle through which Salinger could ask the questions his fiction asked in general more coherently and consciously, maybe in hopes of pursuing an answer. Sometimes I think Salinger spent the majority of his career as a writer essentially telling the same story over and over again, with different variations and from slightly different angles. And, forgive me, but I think For Esme was the one place where he finally got it right... Jeez...youse guys are gonna make me read Nine Stories again :) Jim