D., You address something that I've been thinking about extensively recently, and that is the "breadth of mysticism in Christianity," something a little more accessible to young Franny perhaps than the Buddha-truths. This surprising mysticism as you say, along with other parallels in nearly every religion in the world, is something that I'm interested in exploring. The more that I see these universal "truths" appear in not only my own faith, but also through the Vedas or completely isolated African tribal religions, the more I believe in them. Let's take the ideas behind the Jesus prayer, for instance. First we have this Christian mysticism where the prayer of the heart brings Jesus into every thought, every breath, every heartbeat, because the prayer becomes internalized and everything is God. Only then do we meet God. Then we have Buddhist meditation, where enlightenment comes only through the complete knowing of self. Then the Hindu Vedas teach that God reveals himself to the pure soul, and the pure soul is attained through the Advaita (unity)of the soul with the body, through the practice of meditation, or Raja Yoga. (I'm by no means an expert in any of these faiths, so if I'm at all wrong, I urge someone to correct me.) Joseph Campbell talks about this quite a bit in the Power of Myth, this universality in faith, the same stories arising again and again in the collective subconscious of the separate societies in the world. So by having Franny concentrate on a Christian practice instead of any Eastern method of meditation, wouldn't Salinger be "tricking" his audience a bit, forcing his point home by using this universal thought that just happens to be rooted in the Christian faith? Hmmm... Regards, Cecilia. (Oh, and by the way, I left my little typo in the original message because it's been bugging be ever since I sent it out and I caught it... bibliographic information, not biographic. Here I am, a stickler for everyone else's language, and I mess up my own. My only excuse is that I was working on the biography of Woolf for a presentation that I needed to make, and I'm an idiot. That's all.) > -----Original Message----- > Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:14:59 -0700 > From: "MacLaughlan, D" <DMAC@mail.law.ucla.edu> > To: "'bananafish@lists.nyu.edu'" <bananafish@lists.nyu.edu> > Subject: RE: "The Way of the Pilgrim" > Cecilia Baader wrote: <snip> Here's the biographical > >information: > >Savin, Olga, Trans. _The Way of a Pilgrim_. D. MacLaughlan wrote: [Again, edited for brevity, though I appreciated every word...] > Perhaps this has been mentioned before, but searching for > "Philocalia" (or "Philokalia") instead of "The Way of the > Pilgrim" will result in two different books. One is the Greek work later > translated into Slavonic and Russian, written by Athonite monks in the eighteenth > century; it promotes the practices of the Hesychasts, who believed that > mystical, repetitive prayer, renunciation and devotion > would result in union with God, usually wordless, accompanied by an > inexplicable light (one thinks of the speed and brilliance of Jean de Daumier-Smith's > experience as well). This is Franny's treasured tome. ... > What amazed me about all this was the breadth of mysticism in > Christianity---a mysticism that seems reasonably akin to the > eastern varieties that constituted Buddy's and Seymour's extensive > reading (if Seymour knew that actors should travel lightly, it makes > me wonder why he didn't just assign hesichastic writings to Franny > and Zooey and dispense with the weighty Buddha-truths)... > Regards, > D. MacLaughlan