In a message dated 10/22/99 4:50:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time, seandr@Exchange.Microsoft.com writes: << Despite the endless, earnest, arm-chair philsophizing and intellectual monkey-slapping of literary theorists, I don't think they have, or ever will have, any plausible basis for making the claim, "This is exactly how language works." Literary theory has certainly taught us just how vague, ambiguous, and meaningless literary theory can be. I don't think they've taught us much of anything about language in general. >> I had the feeling Matt was just a Little Bit Tongue in Cheek there, but I could be wrong. However, it's just as off to say they "haven't taught us much of anything about language in general" just because the more recent literary theorists are hard to read. Derrida has made some very important and, in my opinion, inescapable observations about language in at least some of his writings. There's a long and hard philosophical tradition behind what he wrote, however, and unless you're conversant in it, at least a little bit, it's all going to shoot right by. Jim