I'd have thought, Jim, that 'history' suggests the concentration necessary for the accomplishment of anything of value - whether artistic, scientific, social, or whatever - often entails a rather ruthless disregard for the feelings & needs of others. Many great artists, for example, were kindly enough people - taking reasonable care of their dependents & so on. But they were, to a man, quite ruthless in not allowing consideration for others take priority over their obsession with their own work. I was always curious why I should be fascinated with this powerful element of self-sufficient self-absorption when I read about it or encountered it. I was lucky enough, quite early on, to read Freud's essay on Narcissism - a quality of personality that he suggests is common to a great artists, criminal psychopaths, beautiful women, animals, babies, & al. Ever the most gullible of chaps, I found it extraordinarily satisfying & illuminating. Perhaps because it could be used to validate the twists in my own infantile makeup. Remember that for every Hitler there was a Roosevelt (whose wife said after he died: 'I simply served his purposes ...') And that this list is devoted to an artist who doesn't sound exactly like the chairman of the local St Vincent de Paul Society for the Indigent. Scottie B.