Re: Teddy and Booper

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Patti Larrabee: "Re: Sparknotes"
• Previous message: AntiUtopia@aol.com: "Re: From Daumier to Smith"
• Maybe in reply to: PODESTA,Lesley: "Teddy and Booper"
• Next in thread: citycabn: "Re: Teddy and Booper"

In a message dated 9/17/99 5:29:28 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
verona_beach@hotpop.com writes:

<< No, there's definitely a reference in there to the fact that the character
 of Teddy is `based' on Seymour - it's somewhere in S:AI which, I am
 chagrined to admit, I don't currently have a copy of. Buddy speaks about
 how although the two characters are physically different, Teddy was sort of
 pieced together with equivalencies to aspects of Seymour. Can anyone help
 me out here?
 
 P.S. I am equally chagrined to admit I know next to nothing about
 Schopenhauer. For an anti-intellectual Salinger can sure make some
 high-falutin references (:
 
 Camille >>

I remember the reference the same way you do, but can't find it...

Jim

PS RE Inverted Forest...I just went to a friend's website and found out that 
it's a reference in the Upanishads to the Universe -- whose roots are in 
heaven and the branches/leaves are the earth.  Sheesh...I never knew that :)

• Next message: Patti Larrabee: "Re: Sparknotes"
• Previous message: AntiUtopia@aol.com: "Re: From Daumier to Smith"
• Maybe in reply to: PODESTA,Lesley: "Teddy and Booper"
• Next in thread: citycabn: "Re: Teddy and Booper"