M & Mrs. M, Hapworth and God

Laughing Man (the_laughing_man@hotmail.com)
Wed, 29 Sep 1999 01:48:38 -0700 (PDT)

How’s a man supposed to work in this age of the Internet? You get back from 
that one-week stay in Portugal and find you have – apart from the mail of 
colleagues and IRL friends – more than 100 bananafish mail!

>From: William Hochman <wh14@is9.nyu.edu>
>Subject: Re: A (master) piece of film history: McCabe and Mrs. Miller
>One of my favorites too--I was a projectionist in the early seventies and
>the film arrived in the afternoon...though I was going to show it in the
>evening, something made me set it up to preview...I was taken with it then
>and truly enjoyed your response now...thanks, will

Glad you enjoyed my longish reaction to McCabe & Mrs Miller, Will (I’m fully 
aware you probably had to watch it on the chair next to me to find meaning 
in what I wrote; but a preview of you own back in the seventies might have 
done the trick). I watched it a few years ago, and just couldn’t believe it 
would touch me just as much the second time around, but it did.

It is strange, though. Some movies are of the kind you could talk and talk 
about them, never getting tired of discussing the meanings/your impression 
of different parts (or the hole). Something close to what we’re doing with 
Salinger here. Altman at his best – and McCabe & Mrs Miller is made by an 
Altman at his best – works more like a drug. For a short time, everything 
makes sense, even if you don’t know why. But later, the sense of clarity 
looses its rich flavor, and you are left only with the memory of something 
you know – with your mind – is rich and full of poetry, but you can no 
longer feel it inside you. (I’m not totally sure I’m talking about drugs, 
this movie or my latest love story; take a pick)

Happy to see you’re talking about Hapworth, since I happened to get my hands 
on it some time ago – of course by “going through the New Yorker archive”, 
like the Q&A states, nothing illegal (thanks Mr X) – and started reading it. 
Half way through, however, constantly getting irritated by young Seymour, I 
went to Portugal. And when going abroad, an old spell forces me to look 
through the Arlanda Airport book store for something new to read. Every trip 
in my perverted mind is a journey to something new, whatever sorcerer 
planted that cliché inside me.

Anyway, I bought this book “God – A biography”, by Jack Miles. For years 
now, I’ve had this plan in my head (along with my “Marcel Proust plan”) to 
read the Bible from cover to cover. Since it is so unbelievingly boring from 
time to time, this has been an impossible task for me. In “God…”, Miles is 
reading the bible as a literary critic would read Shakespeare’s Hamlet, 
trying to get a grip of the character, his motifs and development from the 
beginning to the end. This, along with Miles impressive knowledge of the 
text and the historical research around it, seems to be a perfect companion 
for actually reading the Bible. Reading Tanakh (the Hebrew version of the 
Old Testament) as the individuation process of God is a very entertaining 
way and right now (I’ve only one third into the book) it looks as he is 
getting away with it.

So I have piled up with my paperback copy of the Bible and my biography for 
the next weeks, I’m afraid. Hapworth will just have to wait.

/TLM

As final ballast I’ll paste this review from Library Journal:

”Despite its provocative title, this is a serious attempt to come to an 
understanding of the portrayal of God in the Tanakh, i.e., the books of the 
Hebrew Scriptures in the order of the Hebrew Bible, as opposed to the order 
in the Old Testament. Miles, a former Jesuit with a Ph.D. in Near Eastern 
languages who is currently a member of the editorial board of the Los 
Angeles Times, offers "knowledge of God as a literary character." While some 
may not care for how God is portrayed-at one point he is "whiny"-the book 
will appeal to believers and nonbelievers alike as an excellent introduction 
to the Hebrew Scriptures that does not read like a Scripture commentary. 
Recommended for all collections.-Augustine J. Curley, Newark Abbey, N.J.”


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com