Scottie: (you can tell by the indenting, if nothing else) > '... What people post to listserves and what they put > out when they're Really writing are two different > things ...' > > That's certainly what Tim asserted some time ago. > But I wonder. I don't doubt we all take greater > care with our more serious stuff. Yet it seems to me > that in the gossipy, informal letters of Hemingway, > Fitzgerald, Woolf, Waugh, Greene, Rowse, Nicolson, > of almost any good writer whose correspondence has > been put out to the public there remains the tell-tale > vitality, the attack, the imprint of style & attitude > that informs their more considered work. I simply > find it difficult to believe that what you would > presumably call a REAL writer can easily put his name > to conscious crap. I often wonder what the corrispondences would look like if the writers had email. I know my paper letters are a better read than my email. > And I STILL think that if I'd been turned down by > 38 - thirty eight - agents I'd be less than wholly confident > about the value - or at least the marketability - of my offerings. of course, 38 failures is often what is reported by great successes. Though, those are rare. -j