Will asks me for something to connect Carl Jung with Salinger or - even less probable, I'd have thought - Holden Caulfield. In either case, I'm afraid I'm not what Laughing Len would call 'yoh menn.' My introduction to psychiatry was in a Worcestershire asylum in 1953 where the head guru was a youngish enthusiast who was among the first advocates of the newly discovered drug, LSD. He was using it to elicit from a group of hysterically gullible young women various fantasies which he demonstrated - to his own satisfaction if no one else's - as Jungian archetypes. As his eager apprentice I was soon up to my neck in Shadows, Mandalas, Animae & - in the case of the more assertive girls - Animi. For a year or so it was all marvellously stimulating & I even took a couple of trips myself equipped with tape recorder & note book to describe at first hand the self-consuming snakes & so on as they appeared before my eyes. Soon enough though, it began to dawn on me that the whole structure was really just a great load of Swiss bollocks. No one was getting any better & the girls themselves seemed to be producing whatever ludicrous imaginings they thought might please the young gentlemen. Reading the great man's books as an accompaniment to all this, it seemed to me that some of his practical thoughts on the psychotherapeutic process had the ring of truth but a most of the anthropological-alchemical-mystical-typological stuff had the ring of something much more like schizophrenia. I grew disillusioned. Some years later in London, I fell among Freudians. Which was a bit like leaving the Boy Scouts to join the 7th.Panzers. It was also,of course, like coming home. Holden is a Freudian too. All those hot house ambiguities about his siblings. The repressed, testosterone-fuelled rage. His obsession with the reaction formation of phonies. The strangely absent parents. Not a mandala in sight. Scottie B.