Rick wrote: > You bring up Mr. Antolini: I think for that to shed some light on > a Seymour-as-predator thesis we would have to say that Seymour is to Mr. > Antolini as Sybil is to Holden; ie. Seymour in the role of aggressor, or > manipulator, or pervert, (mentor/tormentor) and I just don't see that anywhere > on that beach. But in order to reach that conclusion, you have to assume that Mr. Antolini really *was* a manipulator, a pervert--an assumption that I, as of this moment, am not convinced of. Pardon the dangling preposition. > I think there is so much overwhelming evidence of a connection > between Seymour and Holden (though maybe Holden/Buddy makes more sense), Indeed: In Seymour: An Introduction, Buddy refers (not by title) to Catcher In the Rye as "the only book I've ever published"--paraphrased--and that the main character, being Holden, resembled in many ways Seymour. Buddy also goes on to say that Seymour, as the character written in "A Perfect Day," resembles Buddy more than the "real" Seymour. All of this gets very convoluted and tiresome when we try to think of Buddy as a character through whom Salinger wrote all of his work. Just thought I'd throw it out there. --Brendan _______________________________________________________ Get your free, private email at http://mail.excite.com/