Brendan -- I agree that we can't trust Holden's assessment of Antolini (and I think we should be careful to keep a close eye on his assessments of everything else, for that matter: his unsure footing is one of the reasons he, as an adolescent character, has always ringed/rang/rung so true to so many different people, I think). I just mean that if we say that the ambiguity of Antolini's actions opens the door to the possibility of Salinger examining Seymour as having a "sickness" (pedoph.) we would have to look at Seymour in the same light we view Antolini and I don't think the ambiguity is there, in that sense. I think in terms of running themes in the canon (Seymour as a version of Holden & vice versa) that would color our interpretation of the cliff catching, make it less than the kind of desperate and semi-heroic sentiment it is and that doesn't fit for me. I hope that makes a little sense. With nothing better to do at 1 in the morning, rick