well, eh...most theologians view ethics in terms of different "dispensations" or "covenants," the intent of the earlier ones being fufilled by the rules of the older ones. The Old Testament or covenant (or contract, if that's clearer) had rules governing all facets of the civil, personal, governmental, religious and social life of the Hebrew people and was focused upon a particular piece of land. The New Testament or covenant or contract, what have you, is based upon a personal relationship and focuses more upon the individual acting in a community of believers and is not centered around any piece of land on this earth. So fhe focus is more on who you are inside rather than on what food you're eating, etc.... Jim On Tue, 08 Jun 1999 17:44:36 -0400 Aaron <aaron.brager@writeme.com> writes: >> Well, if we're allowed to ignore all that >> stuff, who chooses what stuff we *do* have to follow??? It was all >very >> confusing for a 12 year old (: >> >> Camille > >To me, it all depends on how you interpret it. For example, in the >old >testament, you may not drink a calf that has been bathed in its >mother's >milk. This is interpreted as, "you can't have meat at milk together." > I >don't understand this at all. > >-- >Cheers, > Aaron > >Today's Quote: "Homosexuality is a very interesting topic. And I'm >sure >all of you would like to discuss it, just not with Mr. Acheson." >--Jon >Acheson. > ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.