i have a lot of the same questions, but i have, after a bit of consideration, come to the very surface conclusion that maybe salinger is having seymour use his right hand to shoot himself for simple consistancy: in Seymour: an introduction, at some point buddy says that seymour was righthanded, and so it would follow that he would naturally use that hand. maybe, that's it, just because salinger is creating charactors who i almost forget aren't real, and a right handed person simply would use that hand. on the analytical side, one way (of many, i'm far beyond sure) it could be explained is based on the assumption that the right also represents what is "normal" and in someway just what society believes. if you use that, it is as if that force that is killing him, excuse my ignorance in answering this without rereading the story, because i don't have the book here right now, but what i have been thinking about this lately is that the part with sybil showed that the intellegence of childhood that he clearly values is corrupted by society (my own little thoughts) which is represented by the bananafish bit, (i would get into this, but i'm trying really hard not to diverge), and the bit in the elevator shows pure alienation from society. in saying something true seymour (or anyone, really) is considered insane or something like it. so, when he kills himself it is not really him, but this society that is so different and he can simply not function in. by the way, i just want to mention that if it seems like i'm making a lot of assumptions that i shouldn't, i already wrote a paper that proved a bunch of this stuff, so i'm not jsut making it all up, i'm just working based on those assumptions. i'm sorry this is a bit incoherent, not a strong point at the moment, but i find all this very interesting, and i would like to hear what other people think. Catherine _______________________________________________________________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com