Chris Ohlhoff wrote: > Is anyone interested in reading this rip-off, er, I mean, book? Hmmm. And that's quite a long hmmm. Personally those dreadful `Sequel to Gone With the Wind/Pride and Prejudice' etc churn my stomach in the same way cover bands do young musicians starting out: because they drain away money and interest from where the real stuff is. If it's a clever postmodern petit-historie, I'll take a look. If it's a cynical cash in, I may borrow it from the library in about three years' time. The fact that this is receiving publicity whereas last year's publication of the short story on which `Lolita' itself was based (long thought to be lost; even Nabokov himself told the world he had incinerated it) got through with barely a whisper probably says it all. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST http://www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest