Abra wrote re: Perfect Day: "I=B4m not sure what Salinger is saying about this, as he seems to like both girls...(Sybil and Sharon) From this text, which perspective would you say Salinger likes more??? Do you think he lies when he tell Sybil he only let Sharon sit on the pianobench, because Sybil wasn=B4t there???" I think maybe Seymour was just being charming and careful about the young girl's tender feelings and potential jealousy when he tells her that. But Salinger, I think very pointedly, has Seymour later say "Ah, Sharon...How = that name comes up. Mixing memory and desire." This is almost certainly a refer= ence to Eliot's "Waste Land": "April is the cruellest month, breeding/ Lilacs o= ut of the dead land, mixing/ Memory and desire, stirring/ Dull roots with spr= ing rain." (I hope this doesn't get us sidetracked, but that is the greatest p= oem of the 20th century, no? I know it's not a contest, though.) This allusion brings up both a million fruitful ideas and a million landmines, and it is beyond my capacity to tell the bananafisher king from the red herring. Suf= fice it to say that (despite the protests from the Seymour-as-pedophile camp) t= his whole story (APDFB) is suffused with loss, waste and death, that decay lur= king in the proverbial sunshiney garden, the inevitability of decay that tags a= long with the growth of adolescence. God, there are so many connections we coul= d make between the two, the most obvious (maybe) being the Eastern "Da:Datta= " question/response at the end. I don't doubt that Salinger was influenced b= y this poem's easy (well, easy in the sense that Eliot was a great genius, n= ot necessarily easy to decipher) fluidity and transition between disciplines. Anyway, the connection, if there is one, and I think there is, brings up a= ll kinds of new directions to pursue: the idea of wounding, Eliot's notes in = the margins like the parenthetical asides in S:I, the damage of war re: Esme, = and probably many more. Someone else take over. I'm tired. rick