Brendan wrote: > I'm not quite sure what to make of it this instant, but what I want to know > is why doesn't that stick with me? It kind of smacks of Holden's > unreliability as a narrator, his bizarre exaggerations, but it *has* to > point to something. I'll have to go look at it in context. I think that is the point exactly. It doesn't stick with you. It's said like a throwaway line. But again I use the example of `Tirra Lirra By The River', an Australian book that I've mentioned before. I'm always reluctant to reveal the ending because the ending is really the point of the whole book, it's kind of like a lens that refocuses and gives meaning to the whole experience of the book. I'm proposing the possibility that Holden's line, and the theme it embodies, fulfils a similar purpose in TCIR - but how it would all be cheapened if Holden's last line was `... even if they *did* abuse you as a child' or something like that. Salinger understands the idea of the narrator too well to stoop to that. He *knows* that the thing that is most important to a person is the thing they are the least likely to verbalise. A lot of screenwriters make that mistake - no one ever admits anything unless they're really pressed. Perhaps this was Holden's moment of being really pressed - and that's the most we could get out of him on the subject. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST http://www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest