Haven't thoroughly read this one, but caught "green ink." If I may, let me speak on behalf of the mute "green ink." I believe green ink to be -- not a "statement," or a "yuppie" kind of thing -- but just ink. If by chance I happen to wear sandals and munch celery while I use this "green ink," then am I a yuppie? Am I a collegiate scholar? Or am I a twelve year-old girl suffering from a bad case of acne? Why must we judge? -- Meredith Kay >From: Tim O'Connor <oconnort@nyu.edu> >Reply-To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu >To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu >Subject: Re: curricula & cases >Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:52:57 -0500 > >On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 08:04:16AM +0000, Scottie Bowman wrote: > >> Or are we to assume >> that Salinger attracts a larger proportion of the vegetarian, >> sandal-wearing, Foucault-reading, green-ink brigade? > >This is not meant to seem sardonic, but what do you mean by "green-ink >brigade"? I myself tend to write most drafts in green (with a fountain >pen, no less -- the tactile experience is important for me), and I'd not >heard it used in what sounds like a slightly derogatory way before. > >Again, Scottie, I'm not ticked off or cranky or any of that; I'm curious >about the reference. "Blue pencil" is something I'd associate with an >editor; "red pencil" with a teacher; "red/black ink" with financial >records. But green ink? > >Just curious.... Or haven't had enough coffee today, or sleep last >night. > >--tim > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com