Re: Sunday Times article

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: blah b b blah: "Re: Franny's demise."
• Previous message: josh feldmeth: "Re: will and plays"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "Sunday Times article"
• Next in thread: Florie Sommers: "Re: Sunday Times article"

>Dickinson also wanted her work burned when she died. Actually none of 
>her stuff was published during her life time, it all came after she was 
>gone thats why none of her poems are named. 

but didn't she, a few times in her life, send some of her poems to magazine
publishers, etc and they were rejected?  and didn't they find them, like,
neatly bound in order in her desk...
one might think she WANTED them published
(just a matter or opinion)

>I also worry that his recluse writing will be disappointing. Because we 
>have such a wonderful little group of work we figure that all his work 
>is wonderful. I'm sure that there is stuff there that he wouldn't  have 
>published even during his publishing years. I worry that if it is all 
>released we will be flooded with work that is not his choosing and not 
>his best work. 

i'd still like to read it
it's like publishing hunter thompson's "rum diary"
which isn't that great of a book
but it's still nice to be able to read

"Educating a beautiful woman is like pouring honey into a fine
 swiss watch. Everything stops."  -- Kurt Vonnegut

• Next message: blah b b blah: "Re: Franny's demise."
• Previous message: josh feldmeth: "Re: will and plays"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "Sunday Times article"
• Next in thread: Florie Sommers: "Re: Sunday Times article"