Jim wrote: > The thing about them surpassing their biological age in wisdom was a > complaint I read about Hapwroth. The supposedly seven year old Seymour > presented there wasn't terribly believable to the reviewer... I guess one explaination could be Salinger's belief in reincarnation - perhaps his genius children are, in an extension of Wordsworth's famous `geniuses are those who can rediscover childhood at will', people who have been reincarnated as children but remain essentially adult. Teddy would certainly fall into this category - and, seeing Teddy was `based on' Seymour (as Buddy Glass claims in S:AI), he must therefore have some similar characteristics (I find seeing `Teddy' as a metatext in relation to S:AI a very productive viewpoint). P.S. I tried to respond to the similar sentiments in Dennis Jonnes' email but my answer came out in Greek writing. Yeah, I dunno why either (: Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST http://www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest