> << > Yes - that is after he had written about the Caulfields on and off for ten > years. I find the work I'm doing now more worthy of my time than the stuff > I was writing ten years ago (true, I was ten at the time ... (: ) > > Here's an interesting question : Would the Glasses exist without the > Caulfields - or at very least, would we have heard of them ? > >> > Remember that he hasn't ever allowed the original stories about the > Caufields to be republished. No - and nor have I had the stories I wrote when I was ten republished. But they are in their own way absolutely integral to what I am writing about and indeed, the way I am thinking, today. > I've been wondering lately, with > the latest strings concerning the anti-Glass sentiments, I wouldn't say that `pro - Catcher' is necessarily `anti-Glass'. In fact as far as I know I'm the only one who has actually said anything overtly negative. > what these people > think JD would have to publish these days. A narrative picking up at Good Old > Phoebe's Graduation? I doubt it. Sorry. I must have missed something. What's that got to do with it ? And is it fair to assume that if Phoebe has progressed in time, Boo Boo and Waker haven't? And I think it's very unfair to categorise Catcher fans as unequivocally `snot nosed' teenagers - in that you're assuming that all teenagers are stupid (a stereotype I've spent my career trying to refute), and that `Catcher' is Salinger Lite. I don't think either of these things is true. Sometimes I wish he had stuck to a lot of the simplicity he demonstrated in Catcher and Nine Stories - they are far more truly `Zen' than a lot of what he later produced. Also on the Glasses, I heard that a few years back JDS was going to publish a full length book called `The Fall of the House Of Glass' - galleys were even distributed - but he pulled out at the last second. Is this true ? Has anyone read them ? Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442