Ah, young grasshopper... I, too, was a bit puzzled by the mysterious signatures, until I remembered Bruce/"Frederick"'s email a few days ago: ___ ...But it did get me thinking about the inhabitants of our fish pond... [edited for brevity] ...Granted, some of you ancients--you know who I mean, yes, you, the over-40 crowd--might be a *little* embarrassed, but hey, face it, your lives are *over*. All of us safely under Jack Benny's (yeah, we know who he is) perennial age of 39 are breathing sighs of relief... So. In short, I propose, with each new post, each fish, *once*, appends at the end of her or his post: birth date (don't forget the *year*) and present city of location. I'll start if off: 12/22/81, Westport, CT, USA. And as an added revelation, I live with my dog. --Frederick P.S. Sorry about that typo, it's 80. ObSal: Salinger is over 80, too. I, however, am not. Regards, Cecilia. (My first free evening in weeks and what do I do? Read Bananafish. I wish I'd been in town for the recent flurry of posts on DDS. But alas, Iowa called and I had to commune with cornfields for a couple of weeks. Glad to be back.) --- On Mon, 11 Oct 1999 15:45:40 Matthew Kozusko wrote: >I wasn't quite sure what to make of the birthdate stamps and residence >details that have begun appearing at the bottom of messages. I reviewed the >week's activities but found nothing useful. Then I realized that the >appearance of these peculiar new signatures coincided exactly with my >switching from Netscape's Messenger to Microsoft's Outlook Express. I >checked the "options" configuration under the "tools" menu, and sure enough, >there was a radio button on the "read" tab: "display sender's birthdate and >current residence details." > >Trouble is, I turned this function off and rebooted, but messages are still >coming >through with birthdates and addresses. What's going on? > >Obsal: Sean's recent post on F+Z > > > > --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==-- Share what you know. Learn what you don't.