Re: The talking going on in one's head

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: depressed@collegemail.com: "Re: American Beauty"
• Previous message: citycabn: "Re: dogs OR Re: e.e.c."
• Maybe in reply to: Matt Kozusko: "The talking going on in one's head"
• Next in thread: Steven Gabriel: "Re: The talking going on in one's head"

In a message dated 10/21/99 11:25:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
mkozusko@parallel.park.uga.edu writes:

<< 
 I understand this objection.  Still, I urge the dark side.  C'mon
 over.  It's fun here.  Anything goes.  I'm not quite willing to
 relinquish "generates," even when it comes to tactile perception.  I
 don't think we can really experience tactile stimulation without
 assigning or attaching a significance to it.  Maybe the same for
 animals, too.  They have ears; they can hear. 
  >>

Ok, but it's one thing to attach a significance to a tactile perception and 
the tactile perception itself...

Jim

• Next message: depressed@collegemail.com: "Re: American Beauty"
• Previous message: citycabn: "Re: dogs OR Re: e.e.c."
• Maybe in reply to: Matt Kozusko: "The talking going on in one's head"
• Next in thread: Steven Gabriel: "Re: The talking going on in one's head"