In a message dated 10/25/99 9:23:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Akane574@cs.com writes: << you know, it's really difficult for me, the lowly 16-year-old, to "jump in," so to speak, in these conversations being held...oh well -Lauren- >> Don't feel bad. Look, I decided, on my own, to teach meself Derrida just because I think he's an important philosopher. And because I figured I'd need to know him if I wanted to go to graduate school. So I started reading his Of Grammatology. And beside encountering this hair curling prose, I found out he was writing in response to a bunch of other books, most of which I hadn't read. So as I encountered Derrida's reference to these other books, I thought I'd read them. In the process of reading Of Grammatology I read: Saussere -- Course in General Linguistics Plato -- Phaedrus Rousseau -- Discourses, Essay on the Origin of Language, some of Social Contract Claude Levi - Strauss -- Tristes Tropiques (a chapter in a book), A Writing Lesson and basically gave up after that and just finished Of Grammatology. I picked up some stuff on phenomenology, some Barthes, a shorter work by Heidegger... On top of that, I took a course in literary theory and had some of it explained to me. Then I read some of Eco's stuff, and have some background in hermeneutics as well -- three or four textbooks in that area, some of which involved linguistics. After all that, the best I can say is that I have a pretty good view of a subject I still don't really understand :) I'm serious. I see I've just scratched the surface a bit. A teeny little bit. But I had to work pretty hard to see that. Jim